05/22/2022 / By News Editors
An ACLU staffer wrote Amber Heard’s 2018 op-ed in the Washington Post pitching her as a “public figure representing domestic abuse” after she pledged to donate $3.5 million to the liberal activist group, emails shared in court by Johnny Depp’s legal team reveal.
(Article by Chris Menahan republished from InformationLiberation.com)
From Fox News:
“I tried to gather your fire and rage and really interesting analysis and shape that into an op-ed form,” wrote ACLU communications strategist Robin Shulman in an email to Heard.
At least three other staffers were involved in drafting and revising the piece, testified ACLU COO Terence Dougherty in a pre-recorded deposition played in court Thursday.
Heard requested that the op-ed be published shortly after the release of her movie “Aquaman” to capitalize on the publicity, Dougherty testified.
He also revealed that Heard had only paid $1.3 million of the $3.5 million she publicly pledged to donate to the charity.
The op-ed was published on December 18, 2018. Aquaman was released in the US on December 21, 2018.
Shulman’s op-ed was a truly depraved piece of vomit-inducing propaganda.
It was written to smear Depp without mentioning him explicitly to avoid legal liability, promote her movie and push the ACLU’s radical left-wing legislative agenda.
This is the type of crap the ACLU decided to work on full-time after completely abandoning their commitment to defending the First Amendment post-Charlottesville.
One might say they’ve truly sh*t the bed!
Read more at: InformationLiberation.com
Tagged Under:
ACLU, Amber Heard, celebrities, hollywood, Johnny Depp, lies, metoo, op-ed, propaganda, rigged, Washington Post
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 CELEBRITYREPUTATION.COM
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. CelebrityReputation.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. CelebrityReputation.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.